stapsreads: 'The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them' (Default)
I liked this book very much. The first image that Winterson evokes is that of sedimentary rock, layers upon layers of history, of stories, laid down on top of each other. And her book is like that. On one level it is simply what it says on the tin: the myth of Atlas and Heracles, of how one of them had to hold up the universe while the other did what he had to do. But there is more to it than that: there is the standard Greek mythology, yes, but there is also something that might be autobiographical (one can never quite tell with Winterson), and there is lovely physics stuff - look:

When the universe exploded like a bomb, it started ticking like a bomb too. We know our sun will die, in another hundred million years or so, then the lights will go out and there will be no light to read by any more.

'Tell me the time' you say. And what you really say is 'Tell me a story.'

Here's one I haven't been able to put down.


What pleased me most came very near the end, so I won't say what it was and spoil you - I will just say that it was very unexpected but yet perfectly logical. I loved the blending of ancient and modern ways of understanding the universe. Recommended.

http://www.bookcrossing.com/journal/8017721/
stapsreads: 'The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them' (Default)
This took me a while to get into, but once I had I was hooked. This novel comprises three narratives, two set in the 1910s and one in the 1970s, and deals with the protagonists' travels to and experiences on Te Pito O Te Henua/Easter Island. I was most drawn by Dr Greer Farraday, her research, and her backstory, which was the exciting sort of science - groundbreaking discoveries, academic fraud, extinction, all that sort of thing. As the three stories came together, however, I started paying more attention to the other two. I like the way that Vanderbes leaves some conclusions for the reader to draw; it's nice to be treated as if one were half-way intelligent. I was relieved, too, that the early hints of a tedious faith vs science battle were averted.

One thing I would say is that I was never convinced by the setting - the setting in time, that is; the landscape is very vividly portrayed - the writing around Elsa, Alice and Beazley's expedition always felt a little off, in a way that I can't quite put my finger on. It may be the use of the continuous present; whatever it is, it doesn't feel like 1912. Similarly, Greer et al feel as if they're wandering around in the mid nineties, not the mid seventies, and it's only the challenges faced by Greer's female classmates (who seem to have been shoved in to indicate precisely this) that reminds us that it was a tough life for a woman in academia way back when, oh, and by the way, we are dealing with way back when. The faux military history sections are by far the most convincing stylistically.

Overall, though, I'd recommend this.

http://www.bookcrossing.com/journal/6378748/

Profile

stapsreads: 'The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them' (Default)
stapsreads

June 2013

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 6 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 03:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios